Exam reivew

Berlin (1982), 235 

historical review of the development of composition
literature review (sort of)

identified himself as a new rhetorician

Berlin idenfitied oedoagogies that (roughly) coirrelated with the research paradigms

provides an overview of the field 

Brodkey  (1989) p 621.

comparative methods

literacy letters between teachers and adult basic writing students

people who have power control the information/direction of conversation

class + gender partly define who has power

check out the intro=> what we can say/how we will say it  is determined by our identities

= our identities are socially constructed

what do composition teachers need to do in light of what she finds in the literacy letters

Anderson et al (2006, pdf on Course Blog); 

survey= very long

quantitative methods

classifying different kind of uses of new media in writing pedagogies - what kinds of courses, assignments, where taught, etc

purpose= characterize the use of new media in writing programs

methodology?  

look at findings at the end = agenda?

Royster (1996), 555

focus on voice = who has the right to define it. thoerize it and etc

autobiographical= autoethnographic, phenomenological

reflects on three past experiences

strenghts & weaknesses

method + findings work well together

Elbow (1999), 641

advocated multiple revisions to work towards standard English

support for mother tongue

transformative? make college writing more acessible

qualitative/reflective  = autobiographical

is this research?

is this a case study? personal essay?

Perl (1976), 17

grounded theory/case study

composing practices of unskilled college writers

two different kinds of writing

talk aloud protocol

mixed methods?

findings were? 

Castillo & Chandler (2013), pdf

interview/oral history=> literacy narrative

participatory/collaborative analysis

narrative analysis = connects to power structures + cultural stories/forms=social constructivist

case study

Bartholomae (1985),523 
purpose = point out need to focus on discursive features rather than on "correctness"issues
voice/auhority "privilege" = look at Rafael's notes
transformative? social construction too
discourse analysis of student papers

Heath (1983) pdf;
ethnographic = participant observation supplemented with interviews
literacy  events
societies that rely on oral traditions not inferior to written 
can't judge value of written/oral out of context
social constructivist? transformative?